A second Starlink satellite exploded in orbit

48 points
1/21/1970
a day ago
by wmf

Comments


bombcar

Filing “fragment creation event” alongside “rapid unintended disassembly”.

a day ago

dragonwriter

A “fragment creation event” that was “likely caused by an internal energetic source”.

a day ago

user____name

And "surrounded by too much hot air."

20 hours ago

porphyra

Fortunately,

> Due to the low altitude of the event, fragments from this anomaly will likely de-orbit within a few weeks.

a day ago

aaron695

[dead]

a day ago

manoDev

Second? When was the first?

Is this an instance of weaponization of the LEO? No statement from SpaceX?

a day ago

dragonwriter

> When was the first?

17 December 2025, per the thread.

a day ago

heyitsmedotjayb

Do they have pressurized gas/liquid onboard that could explode or is this most likely a collision?

a day ago

wmf

They have argon gas for the ion thrusters that adjust the orbits.

a day ago

verdverm

If it were a collision, it would be far more noteworthy and likely in the title

a day ago

heyitsmedotjayb

why would it be more noteworthy?

17 hours ago

verdverm

It would involve a failure in coordination, observation, or management of orbits. These things make adjustments more often than people realize (aiui)

12 hours ago

cozzyd

Tubes must have gotten clogged

a day ago

metalman

if, just saying, someone had a huge fucking laser and wanted something to plink away at, and happened to look up at night, most anywhere on the planet, ran the numbers and figured the odds, and well elo's stuff does blow up regularly

a day ago

DarmokJalad1701

> and well elo's stuff does blow up regularly

[citations needed]

a day ago

NetMageSCW

Really? How many Starlink satellites have blown up? How many F9 second stages?

a day ago

altairprime

There are a lot of better ways to present your point; for example:

How many batteries supplied with Elon Musk’s companies’ products have encountered an unplanned combustion event after light or no damage?

Does SpaceX use in-house or third-party batteries in their satellites?

Is their explosion rate of 2(?) per N, where N is the number of unexploded SpaceX satellites, plausibly still within the statistical ranges defined by non-SpaceX satellites given the data available to us?

Did the satellite deflect before it exploded or are the shard trajectories consistent with a zero-impact scenario?

etc.

a day ago

vrighter

hate to be pedantic, but for 2 out of N, n would have to be the sum of all satellites including the exploded ones

a day ago

altairprime

You’re probably right but the question isn’t mine in the first place; look up some data and you’re set to discuss with OP. I was constructing communication examples, not mathematically-correct ones. Guess I did well enough at that!

19 hours ago