Components
Hacker news
Account
Sample One
Sample One

Scientists Cloned a Mouse for 58 Generations. The Results Were Catastrophic

10 points
1/21/1970
15 hours ago
by Jimmc414

Comments

justinclift

This is very poorly written. :(

> DNA sequencing and analysis of duplicated mice revealed no differences between early and later generations of clones. But that began to change after generation 27, when genetic abnormalities began to negatively affect fertility.

If there were "no differences" between early and later generations of clones, then what "abnormalities" are they talking about?

9 hours ago

defrost

No differences in the DNA sequences for N iterations ... and yet physical and genetic abnormalities eventually appeared after N+1.

The suggestion then is that other information about the iteration of copies of copies is being passed, from the article:

  There may have been several causes behind the abnormalities that arose in later generations.

  {various potential causes discussed}
If the Popular Mechanics paraphrasing of the original paper is poor, there's always the OG source:

Limitations of serial cloning in mammals - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69765-7

9 hours ago