When the Internet Was a Place (2025)
Comments
spaqin
torben-friis
>And in totality, it's not a bad thing - people that would probably have a boring job all their lives otherwise have built their wealth and connections, and the audience has been entertained. But money sucked the fun out of it.
It absolutely is, because everything is adversarial. Every piece of advice is a hidden ad, every friendly person an attempt to lure you into parasocial relations, every teacher a course seller.
We went from a community to normalizing psychopathy.
krabizzwainch
We simply exist as vessels to be advertised to.
prox
Hear hear.
It seems so innocent. “Just an ad” but the whole influencing industry is kind of a nice word for “manipulation”
When the cost of manipulation is so low, and the repercussions for lying and cheating are not there, everything gets skewed.
qsera
And a little while before that, the desktop computer was a mystical thing that could take you to wonderlands. I was truly an intriguing machine, instead of just another home appliance.
yazantapuz
Exactly. Thats it what i most miss, the sense of wonderful misteries and possibilities that the computer had.
sunir
I have a text book called Hamlet on the Holodeck about how the machines could take imagination to greater heights.
Now it’s all about dopamine. Lower gutters.
Humans never change so I have hope things will correct and we dream again.
mghackerlady
I don't think that's fair to the wonderful people using the computer for imagination, they're called game developers and there are so many wonderful experiences out there. A lot of the AAA stuff is kinda trash nowadays, but you still have some older stuff and indie games. Off the top of my head, some really great experiences I've had:
Persona 3, probably any game in the series belongs here but this one's my personal favorite
Fallout New Vegas, last good fallout game
Undertale, really good indie rpg that flips rpgs on their head. Also has really good music
Deltarune, not finished but is a pseudo-sequel to undertale
Celeste, lovely little platformer with a good soundtrack. Trying to 100% it will make you want to rip your hair out
qsera
The computer being a mystical machine is also a lot about the period in which existed. I think since computers were not very powerful it was a bit magical how much stuff it can be made to do just with the right instructions (I mean software). I mean, one day it can only do ASCII output in, and the next day it is playing movies at 24bit color, Just with the right software..
At least for me, this inspired to spend endless nights with the computer in hopes of making it do magical things (which I managed to accomplish to my great satisfaction). For example, "morphing" was a big deal back then and was everywhere, in commercials, music videos an movies. One late night I implemented a QBasic program that can "morph" between two figures (also traced using a program that controlled a pixel using keyboard).
I understand that it is trivial, but to me accomplishing that was magical (in my own terms ofcourse)...
47thpresident
> Persona 3
I've been playing Persona 3:Reload recently and little things like the pause menu [1] and the overall visual presentation clearly have so much deliberation and thought put into them that they feel like interactive art pieces rather than menus. This pretty much extends to every recent Atlus game [2].
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d6x1CIgLSc [2] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/arts/metaphor-refantazio-...
mghackerlady
I never got that far in reload (I have limited time with a PS4 since it's technically my brothers) but boy oh boy is it sure a looker
sunir
That's fair; I am not in the loop with indie games personally but I do know it's a golden age of creativity.
yazantapuz
Shadow of the Colossus and Ico.
mghackerlady
I've played a bit of Shadow of the Colossus (got through the first colossus fight). I enjoyed it, I just haven't picked it up since I got it haha
MarkusWandel
The internet was places. Plural. Places like watmath, ucbvax and the like. Real physical computers in places you'd heard of, and the amazing thing was that you could access them from elsewhere.
Maybe I was a special case even then, but I wanted a place of my own. A place running a Unix type operating system and permanently connected to the internet with a fixed IP address, like those places of old. I've actually had this for 25+ years.
Accces to those "places" from a device in your pocket didn't change any of that.
Nowadays it's become the anonymous "cloud". Nobody knows how it works, or where the server is or who runs it.
RataNova
The phone in your pocket did not necessarily destroy that. What changed more was the disappearance of legible ownership and locality
beej71
wuarchive.wustl.edu, ftp.funet.fi!
schnitzelstoat
I think the big change has been a shift to massive platforms for everything - so before you'd have hundreds of little vBulletin forums, IRC servers etc.
Nowadays the vBulletin forums have been replaced by subreddits, the IRC servers by Discord channels etc.
It's concentrated the people all in these few platforms which then gives the platform owners (and subreddit/channel moderators) an incredible amount of power and just made everything feel more homogenous and corporate.
rileymat2
It’s not that big a change these forms have existed for a long time, AOL was a giant closed Goliath for a large number of users.
AlfredBarnes
One could even argue that Google Search was/is THE platform of the internet. If you're not there you're not anywhere.
pjmlp
And before that, specific BBSs, for those that could afford the dial ups to them.
TFNA
I think that even if there were a wide array of forum websites, the discussion culture would be very different than the old days. The majority of people's default device now is their phone, and that discourages the kind of longform text posts that were once common. You'd just have a million little Reddits.
And that's not to mention the deleterious effects on discourse of an upvote/downvote functionality, which wasn't part of old forum websites but today's forum software lets you implement it.
luckyandroid
Every single discussion around UI is now laden with "this isn't 100% optimized for user interaction" like there's some rulebook dictating exactly what you have to do for your website to be useable.
There's benefits to this, but the main con is that now everyone wants everything to look the same and the fun of the internet disappeared. Everything's a product, nothing's an experience.
AlfredBarnes
"Everything's a product, nothing's an experience."
- Love that!
memonkey
was just thinking how I'd like to have multiple chat boxes like for AIM vs a tabbed experience like with all chat clients now
smrtfckrr
I too am waiting for the pendulum to swing from clean corporate cookie cutterism back to dumb fun and I believe it's up to us to make that change. It probably won't happen on its own.
jareklupinski
i wrote a zine on how to set up your own server / website and left free copies of them around some friendly indie bookstores and libraries
hopefully we'll see something new soon
Uncle_Brumpus
I am interested in setting up my own site to contain my random musings and silly photography. Currently in the "collecting resources and knowledge" phase. If you're into zine trading I can mail-trade you the first issue of my photo zine (shot with a PDA camera module). There are seemingly unlimited other resources out there, but having it in short-form physical format is an attractive premise.
mghackerlady
It's slowly happening in more counterculture-y spaces
pixelpoet
The article seems to repeat its thesis almost verbatim three times.
dwedge
And the title/concept seems mostly copied from this YouTube video from a mouth earlier: https://youtu.be/oYlcUbLAFmw?si=T1AIE4w49qF1u7ul
I think about that video quite often
booleandilemma
Thanks. Glad I'm not the only one who felt that. I think the author just learned the word panopticon.
userbinator
It doesn't have the usual giveaways of LLM text (except for the rather prominent dashes) but definitely has a similar verboseness and repetitiveness. Human writing can be like that too, if its author wanted to pad it out to a word quota.
nonameiguess
I have no idea how she generated the text, but whether LLM or not, it isn't a recounting of direct experience. The author graduated high school in 2019 and never experienced the Internet of the 90s and doesn't remember pre-2006 because she was a toddler.
AnimalMuppet
That's not necessarily disqualifying. One can be a historian even if not a reporter.
Every article on the Roman Empire is written by people too young for direct experience.
sixtyj
“This has resulted in fractured attention, anxiety, and sadly, a diminished sense of place and belonging even with the connectivity the internet could offer.”
Do you think this might also be related to recent people’s estrangement from housing?
Housing seems to become a commodity as other things…
PeterWhittaker
I guess I am showing my age, but no, the Internet was never "a place", for me and my ilk.
The Internet was just another network, albeit one that worked more reliably (most of the time) and with less configuration effort (most of the time) than UUCP. I didn't "go to the Internet", it was just another path to the computer on my desk, the most convenient way to get USENET. If I "went anywhere", it was deliberate, using Gopher or WAIS to find things then "visiting" a place with ftp. Or telnet.
The only "other place" I had then was the VT220 (? It's been a while) in the basement with the Gandalf (? ditto) modem, eventually replaced with a PC and a Hayes (? ditto bis). I had to physically go somewhere to access work, but then again, I had to physically go somewhere to access work even without remote/home access.
My then-me would say that the author confuses the Internet with "the world wide web as accessed from a personal device".
Perhaps if one was just the right age at just the right time, the Internet Was a Place, but for anyone before and anyone after it was just was and just is.
RiverCrochet
> Perhaps if one was just the right age at just the right time, the Internet Was a Place, but for anyone before and anyone after it was just was and just is.
This is well put and I agree. I think there was a unique set of factors that made 1998ish-2006ish the prime time for the Internet to be a "place." The prevailing techno-optimism borne of the 90s was one of those factors.
RataNova
The old web was not necessarily better in every way but it had a clearer boundary: you sat down, went online, did something and then left
Ayaan2004
i love those days where we uses visit internet cafes to play games and enjoys the internet through searching in google.com
altern8
altavista.com
richsouth
Don't you mean www.altavista.com ?
roryirvine
Originally altavista.digital.com - the sheer length of the URL was a frequent source of complaints!
bandrami
Webcrawler
euroderf
Quick quiz! Who remembers off the top o'their head what Yahoo is an acronym for ?
firmretention
As an aside - anyone else really dislike the typeface used on this page? I find it difficult to read.
kkfx
Internet is not the web... And we do need to destroy boundaries to break walled gardens not creating new one for the joy of giants who knows their "oligopoly power"...
booleandilemma
The thing that kills me is how serious it's gotten. Can't joke around anymore, not unless you're doing it ironically.
ryu2k2
You can't even do it ironically anymore because the average user doesn't pick up on it and whatever insane joke you pull will become internet norm in the future
userbinator
Memes are still a thing.
dwedge
Are they though? I realised a couple of weeks ago that meme culture seems to have died. Obviously not to zero, we still see them, but there seemed to be two meme times - the advice animals time of around 2014, and another time since, but they don't seem popular now
mghackerlady
They're completely unrecognisable as memes since they increasingly don't use exploitables, but they're still out there. r/memes is very much around and well, if you want to see what's currently a thing sort by top of this year/month/week
esseph
> Are they though? (...) meme culture seems to have died
This is how I know you're out of touch.
The kids and their memes are alive and well, you just don't know where they are and what that looks like.
hattmall
If it's that easy to miss then the culture has comparatively died. Memes are still around, but there was a period where they were everywhere. Like the gas station would have a bad luck Brian meme if the bathroom was out of order. You walked in Kohls and there were three different variations of "Know Your Meme" type games on an end cap. The average person would see and hear multiple memes daily in the course of everyday non-internet related activities, then they fell way off. 6-7 was the meme culture dead cat bounce.
esseph
They're video and ai now. And most are too dark to be posted publicly by publicly traded companies, or they punch up and money doesn't like that.
My kids send me stuff on discord daily.
squigz
The kids are memeing heavily with AI. I don't understand it, but then again, my parents wouldn't have understood rage comics or other memes from back in the day.
Really not sure what GP is referring to - lots of humor still going around - but I can probably guess.
sublinear
The internet is for everyone. That includes what you're not interested in.
It's pretty clear to me you all are just looking for closure. You do not want to live in the past. You can prove it to yourself by finding any old discussion archive and feeling the cringe. You do not want the values of the past either. You're chasing a feeling that is more related to your own aging than what various media like the internet "are".
Things would have changed anyway. You might just be upset that it wasn't on your terms. You can try to revive old ideas, but that veers into art. Art is very hard and requires a much deeper perspective than nostalgia. The perspective required to create what you want will also necessarily ruin what you expected to feel from it.
A relevant quote: "Everything was better back when everything was worse" - David Sipress, The New Yorker, Nov 24, 2003
hattmall
Nah, disagree, things were actively better in a few ways. The big tech companies now purposely diffuse and obfuscate the value proposition to increase engagement and show more ads. There are some ways in which things have improved and that's mostly with standardization and pure accessibility, but the quality is extremely decreased.
For several of my interests I still participate in the modern version of what would previously have been dedicated websites powered by forums, but they are now on Facebook / reddit / discord and collections of YT videos. The quality of information is nowhere near what it was. The amount of spam, platform ads, and useless posts to drive engagement is easily over 50% of the content. There is no timely cohesive flow of posts or discussion. The benefits are far more members and consistent mobile access but they come with huge tradeoffs. Prioritizing mobile has many downsides and most of those users do not meaningfully contribute or even actively pollute the content.
It's not just nostalgia, the quality of content and sense of community was much better when people went into their own corners to discuss things vs everyone standing in the center and yelling over the background noise of a common ad-suoported platform.
shevy-java
> In the 1990s and 2000s, the internet was a deeply physical thing, a location. One “arrived” at the internet with purpose and intention. It was an embodied experience.
As much as I think Google, Facebook etc... should be removed - that view shown in the article is also strange. It assumes that we all had "intentions", all of the time; and now that we don't have those intentions. That's not true.
For instance, searching for news was always one big thing with the old internet too. How old is the BBC website? I am sure it is old. Same with many other websites.
I remember when Wikipedia was founded in 2001: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Wikipedia
That is not necessarily the "old" internet as I would call it, since I refer there more to the 1990s, but still it was at the tail-end. Clearly people had a requirement or need to find articles and read up on staff, already before 2001. But you did not always necessarily have "intentions" all the time. Browser games were quite popular in the late 1990s. Also Java Applet games too. And of course commerce as well, though possibly not as convenient as amazon initially was (before succumbing to the prime slop). Amazon was launched in 1995.
Today's internet has various problems, largely created by, say, youtube owned by Google trying to get people "connected" on the platform 24/7. But we should not have nostalgia kick in too much when looking back at the old internet. There was no "embodied experience" - I would not even know what that should be. It may have been slower but you had broadband connection in the 1990s too, as I had that. I never used model dial-up (though, perhaps very early on ... but for the most part no, just broadband).
roryirvine
The BBC News website was actually a relative latecomer - an early variant of the platform was used for the May 1997 general election (parts still online at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/ ) and reused for the coverage of the death of Princess Diana that August, but the full service didn't go live until the end of the year.
I agree that a lot of this nostalgia is unrealistically misty-eyed. The window during which independent sites ruled the web was extremely narrow, essentially the time between the release of NCSA Mosaic 2 and the launch of Hotwired.
Consumer internet hype took off from the beginning of 1995, and by the end of that year the web was already overwhelmingly commercialised.
pryncevv
[dead]
Yeah sure, but it doesn't explain why. If I were to point out to anything, it would be monetization - starting from early ads ruining everything with pop-ups, through corporations gathering data, bad actors exploiting every little vulnerability to get some leverage, to users themselves aligning themselves with money; less and less people doing what they want just for fun, but rather adhering to corporate guidelines and ad strategies to get as much as they can out of this system. So much that other internet users who don't get anything out of it would also start behaving that way, maybe with hopes of getting a slice of the pie at some point. Maybe their next tweet will be a hit?
And in totality, it's not a bad thing - people that would probably have a boring job all their lives otherwise have built their wealth and connections, and the audience has been entertained. But money sucked the fun out of it.