Venom and hot peppers offer a key to killing resistant bacteria

174 points
1/21/1970
5 days ago
by littlexsparkee

Comments


charliebwrites

If you’ve ever wondered why the symbol of health is a snake spiraling a staff (the Greek god Asclepius’s staff to be specific), it’s because in Ancient Greece they used small amounts of snake venom to treat serious illnesses

We’ve come full circle

3 days ago

jolt42

I always assumed what I felt was obvious: Numbers 21:4-9, where God instructs Moses to make a bronze serpent and place it on a pole to heal Israelites dying from poisonous snake bites.

3 days ago

Ar-Curunir

But the symbol is explicitly non-abrahamic in origin…

2 days ago

jolt42

And yet the similarities can't be coincidental. Rod + Snake = Life Saving.

2 days ago

Ar-Curunir

Not sure what you’re trying to say? That the Greeks got it from a Semitic people? Or something else?

a day ago

jolt42

"The universe is rarely so lazy"

a day ago

realo

Sorry but the bible is not a historic document.

If you want to read old texts a bit more grounded in reality try the Kama Sutra ... ;)

2 days ago

nelox

The Bible contains many verifiable historical references supported by archaeology and ancient records, even as a primarily theological text. Here are three examples:

1. The Tel Dan Stele and the House of David

This 9th-century BCE inscription records an Aramean king’s victories over the “king of Israel” and the “king of the House of David.” It gives the earliest extra-biblical proof of the Davidic dynasty at the heart of the Hebrew Bible.

2. Sennacherib’s Prism and Hezekiah

The prism names “Hezekiah the Judahite,” details the capture of 46 cities, and describes besieging Jerusalem in 701 BCE, closely matching 2 Kings 18–19, including the tribute paid.

3. The Pilate Stone and Pontius Pilate

Found at Caesarea Maritima, this inscription names “Pontius Pilate, Prefect of Judea” under Tiberius, directly confirming the Roman official who tried Jesus in the Gospels.

These independent sources from rival powers strongly support the Bible’s historical value where evidence exists.

2 days ago

nullsanity

[dead]

2 days ago

MrFots

The Christian Bible is not a historical document.

a day ago

jolt42

That wouldn't prevent the caduceus from being based on the story.

a day ago

silveira

It seems that it's quire more complicated than that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caduceus_as_a_symbol_of_medici...

3 days ago

caminanteblanco

I thought the predominant one was: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_of_Asclepius

2 days ago

sandworm101

I was taught that the symbol came from Egypt, specifically a reference to standard guinea worm treatment whereby the worm was extracted from under the skin by winding it around a stick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dracunculiasis

3 days ago

canadiantim

I suspect the symbol has deeper roots than that, though you are likely right about the snake venom being used then to treat illness.

3 days ago

koolba

I thought it’s a stick to pull out a tape worm. You wrap it around the worm and keep twisting to get it out.

3 days ago

croisillon

now do the "save to disk" symbol

2 days ago

orangebread

And then you have a ready-made worm kabob, ready to roast and eat! Infinite food exploit unlocked.

2 days ago

cjbgkagh

I’m partial to the Guinea worm medical symbol theory, though happy to be convinced otherwise.

3 days ago

eth0up

There's a strange, quiet conflict among old school medical professionals regarding the rod of Asclepius vs the Caduceus. Interesting topic

2 days ago

RataNova

Medicine has always borrowed from biology's more dangerous toolkit

2 days ago

boringg

We also recently (we think) discovered why acupuncture works. That form of medicine from 4000 years ago...

3 days ago

baxtr

Huh. We did? Could you share a link to a paper? Curious to find out about the "why".

3 days ago

pelf

Do you happen to have a source for that? I’d love to check it.

3 days ago

tmoertel

It's the New York Times article that's linked to in this HN post about “the Interstitium”:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48095536

3 days ago

NDlurker

Radiolab did a show on that a couple years ago. Pretty interesting listen.

https://radiolab.org/podcast/interstitium

They also did an episode about rapamycin that I thought was really cool. I had no idea the history of it and found it fascinating and it really gets the imagination going thinking about what other things are hidden all around us.

https://radiolab.org/podcast/dirty-drug-and-ice-cream-tub

2 days ago

om2

That article doesn’t explain why acupuncture works, just gives a hint of a possible mechanism. It also doesn’t contain any evidence that acupuncture works at all (other than as a placebo).

3 days ago

kelipso

There’s also electroacupuncture, which is gaining popularity in physical therapy clinics in the US.

> Like traditional acupuncture, electroacupuncture uses needles placed in the same spots. Then, a small electrode is attached to the needles. A small amount of electricity runs through the electrode and gives a slight vibration or soft hum during treatment. (1)

Since they use the same spots as traditional acupuncture even now, I would think traditional acupuncture does work to some degree.

(1) https://www.webmd.com/pain-management/cbd-cbn-what-is-differ...

3 days ago

soperj

I read a paper that basically said that the spot itself didn't matter so much, that part was voodoo, but the needling produced a response from your body that helped.

2 days ago

cyberax

I did a course of dry needling for tendon inflammation. It's basically just poking tendons with needles. It's an accepted treatment and it works, but the spots don't matter at all (as long as they are in the same area).

It's just relying on poking stuff with needles to improve the blood flow.

2 days ago

awesome_dude

Um, the spots do seem to have some importance - there's little point jabbing your left temple if, as you say, the aim is to improve the blood flow to your ankles

2 days ago

blendergeek

Your reference seems to be about CBD, not "electro acupuncture"

2 days ago

kelipso

Here you go buddy. Webmd or google links issue, who knows. https://www.webmd.com/pain-management/what-is-electroacupunc...

a day ago

jjk166

I imagine the long term solution to antibiotic resistance are engineered bacteriophages, either to directly attack the bacteria or to insert genes that make the bacteria susceptible to specific agents. Beyond not having to continuously develop new antibiotics or restrict treatment, these could also be much more targeted treatments with less harmful effects on a patient's microbiome. Of course scaling up to mass production on the level of say penicillin will take some time, but the same is true for new antibiotics.

2 days ago

shellfishgene

But bacteria also become resistant against phages, you would still have to continuously develop new ones.

2 days ago

Intralexical

I have no idea if this is true, but I remember seeing in a Kurzgesagt video that developing phage resistance reduces antibiotic resistance, and vice versa. So you might corner bacteria by using both.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI3tsmFsrOg&t=5m18s

2 days ago

jjk166

Improving phages is dramatically easier - you can just modify an existing one, either through direct engineering or by evolution, rather than having to find a brand new chemical that conveniently does what you want without serious negative drawbacks. 20 years ago the difficulty may have been comparable but the engineering tools for creating synthetic phages have advanced extremely rapidly.

And particularly if you are introducing a vulnerability instead of directly attacking the bacteria with the phage, there is no evolutionary pressure to become resistant until the phage has already done its job. You can even go further and have it insert genes that confer an advantage in addition to the susceptibility, so that even if some of the bacteria are by chance naturally resistant to the phage they get outcompeted prior to the deployment of the killing agent.

2 days ago

RataNova

I agree phages are probably part of the answer

2 days ago

pshirshov

"Researchers have developed", yeah. When I read such things, I always recall https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epimerox - this thing promised wonders - very broad spectrum, very low toxicity - and, most importantly, it was targeting a conservative essential protein - so nearly zero resistance. And there were no updates for more than a decade.

Something developed in a lab is something we, most likely, will never see - and will never know why the thing didn't reach the 2nd stage (or the 1st).

3 days ago

kingkawn

This is because a broad spectrum antibiotic with low resistance is an essential public good that will likely rapidly be made generic by either legal action or international disregard for copyright law. So no major pharma companies will want to invest resources into the development of something like this, and governments are not under the gun enough to produce new abx to invest the billions needed to get it through the approval process. The compromise is to leave it sitting at this phase until some disaster creates enough public incentive to socialize the completion of its development.

3 days ago

maxbond

Is this particular drug head and shoulders above other candidates? Is it possible that the reason it hasn't gotten attention is because researchers have been looking at other cheaper or more promising candidates? (I do not know, I am genuinely asking.)

2 days ago

pshirshov

Same thing - I do not know. It got pretty decent media coverage back then - and nothing since.

2 days ago

cubefox

Similar thing, permanent anti-cavity bacteria:

https://www.cremieux.xyz/p/the-rise-and-impending-fall-of-th...

The patents expired, so nobody can raise the hundreds of millions to do the phase II/III safety trials.

2 days ago

fakedang

It depends - if someone uses the same compound but provably for a different indication (like maybe anti-periodontic diseases or something) or for a different intake mechanism, they could get another patent and proceed with trials.

Granted, it's not going to be easy because the original patent has expired so it's going to be very easy for an upstart Indian company to conduct basic clinical trials, use part of the data of the second patent's holder to prove equivalency (they did this test so we don't need to do this test), and then get approved through an accelerated pathway in the FDA. Which is why even well-capitalized players will shy away from what could be a cash cow.

2 days ago

cubefox

Anti-periodontic diseases are highly irrelevant compared to cavities. Not even the original cavity application did manage to get enough funding at the time. So there will be no Indian upstart, there is and likely will be nobody who invests the money into ultra expensive trials. The ship has sailed.

2 days ago

fakedang

I wasn't trying to quote a directly applicable example, just wanted to illustrate a potential pathway for post-expiry commercialization.

a day ago

arcticfox

This story actually checks out, which is quite the condemnation of our American drug development system.

One thing bugs me though - why don't other countries with different research structures pick this up and run with it?

2 days ago

toast0

I agree... Medication Resistant bacteria is a problem everywhere. There's probably no money in a new antibiotic, but... Having something new to fight TB would be nice, and there's still prestige, even if you "just" brought it to market and didn't discover it.

I would think there are pharma teams in China or India, maybe even Russia that could replicate and further develop something like this, given the initial paper and PR.

2 days ago

awesome_dude

My immediate thought - there probably are these teams overseas doing these things - just, our media/markets shun them.

I mean, the covid vaccinations - people are/were doing their nut about the Euro/US versions, but the Russians had their own, the Chinese had two, and I am aware that the Chinese were handing it out to other countries as part of their aid programs (the effectiveness of those vaccines, however, has been questioned, especially in comparison to the Euro/US ones, but I'm not sure if that's reality or politics, it's so damned hard to tell these days)

2 days ago

elzbardico

American salaries and research funding are way bigger. The best scientists around the world have a strong incentive to emigrate. And the ones who don't, can't do much with the scarce funds they have, compared to America.

2 days ago

cyberax

> This story actually checks out, which is quite the condemnation of our American drug development system.

Oh yeah, "corporations", "end-stage capitalism", blah blah.

The reality is that 95+% of drug candidates fail the trials. And a lot of them only fail during the Phase-3 where the efficacy is tested. It's likely that large companies tried it in-house and found that it's either too toxic or is ineffective in-vivo.

2 days ago

vazma

I guess you are right but can you please provide a source of the failed trials for this case!

2 days ago

cyberax

Looks like there are none, which is the typical result. If you worked in a drug-discovery-adjacent field, this is an utterly normal scenario:

1. University/startup company finds a promising drug candidate that works in-vitro. They make a press-release, researchers write their theses, and move on.

2. Drug companies pick that up and run small-scale tests. These tests are negative, usually because of unexpected toxicity.

Looking at the molecule in question, it's likely what happened here. It's a covalent inhibitor, meaning that it permanently binds with the protein. It's also allosteric, meaning that it binds to the target enzyme but not at the actual active site. This is a huge red flag for toxicity, because it's likely going to bind to other proteins that can have similar configurations.

3. But the underlying idea is sound, so companies keep working on alternative approaches. They are likely looking for non-covalent compounds now, or for things like "suicide inhibitors".

4. You'll see actual trials in 10-15 years after the initial press-release. Most likely for completely different compounds, targeting the same mechanism.

2 days ago

awesome_dude

There was what I thought was a breakthrough in Schizophrenia diagnosis and treatment - the University of Washington held that groups of genes acting in concert were causing the disease, and, in fact, there were multiple variants of genes producing (what had always been suspected) different diseases that were bing lumped together.

For the longest time I had been trying to figure out why nobody was taking the research seriously, why there weren't diagnostic kits available that determined which variant people were actually suffering from, and using the appropriate drug regime to manage the specific condition the patient had.

Then, last year I saw a paper being discussed (some 5 - 10 years after the initial paper), and it was building on the Washington research - it appears to me now (keeping in mind that I am a layman and an outsider) that the research /had/ been taken seriously, but it's seen as a signpost on the pathway rather than the destination.

2 days ago

NDlurker

It was pretty common for message board users to come together to do group buys for novel research chemical synthesis 15-20 years ago. Not sure why things like this would be any different.

2 days ago

katzito

Can't make moneyz if it works too wellz.

2 days ago

strbean

See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-stranded_RNA_activated_...

This one is quite tinfoil-hat inspiring, as the research was moved to defense-focused Draper Labs and then immediately disappeared.

2 days ago

littlexsparkee

5 days ago

eth0up

I have struggled with various infections over the last 15 years. One of them, among the worst being h-pylori. Of all these infections, I've been forced, due to absence of healthcare and aversion to the medical industry in general, to treat myself across the board.

H Pylori is a very interesting subject, deeply misunderstood until a certain Australian hero brute forced through the arrogance of the day by infecting himself to prove ulcers weren't the product of psychosomatics.

Ending the rant there, I discovered through research that capsaicin (only one of the virtues of peppers) has a manifold effect upon various bacteria, notably pylori. Aside from encouraging the pylori to swim away from the capsaicin, it disrupts their biofilm behavior, and empirically, can drastically help with ulcers counter to expected problems with its spicy nature.

Adjacently, it can also encourage mucosal stimulation and protection.

I've found, co administered with mastic, oregano, NAC, and a few things presently inaccessible to the ol' cabbage.... Ahh, that's one... Cabbage juice! -- the infection can be reduced to sustainable levels without conventional antibiotics. Modern research is suggesting that h pylori, partly due to its ubiquity (50% of population +) and the ravages of antibiotics, it may be best to simply reduce it to manageable levels where the immune system and general well being keep it controlled.

There is also the wonder of fermented chilies which is good for many things, includes probiotics, improves most meals and really irritates assholes, which is righteous.

2 days ago

m348e912

Cabbage juice is very promising in helping with number of gut related issues due to it's anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-inflammatory properties. Organic green cabbage, freshly juiced seems to be the most effective, but wow does it create a stink and doesn't taste great. I am not sure how someone take it regularly without crashing out and giving up.

2 days ago

loudandskittish

Oh, cool, so another thing I was avoiding due to H Pylori actually could've helped... (but seriously, thanks for posting this).

2 days ago

metalman

recently here, there was an article suggesting that combining hot chilies, with mint, acentuated the anti inflamitory effects of capsaicin by 100 times, and reminds me that I was waiting for my mint to come up, which it will most definitly have done, and I have fresh chillies so the bar is very very low to try it for taste, if nothing else.

2 days ago

varispeed

I am addicted to hot peppers. What I do in the morning is get one Scotch Bonnet (or two smaller ones), two oranges, lime and a piece of ginger into a cold press and then drink it in one go.

Can't describe it exactly, but it's like being transported to another dimension for a few seconds, then there is pain, then there is relief and then a nice warm feeling in the belly.

3 days ago

uejfiweun

I too am addicted to hot peppers. But doesn't this... IDK, it seems like it would mess up my stomach or esophagus lining or something. All that acid and capsaicin on an empty stomach?

2 days ago

varispeed

I've been doing this for like two years now and see no adverse effects, but that is just me.

2 days ago

sosborn

I would be worried about long term damage. In 10 years you might be in a world of hurt from this. At the very least I would let your doctor know that you are doing this and see what they think of it.

2 days ago

riknos314

If your intestinal lining is healthy, there's probably not much to worry about.

If it hurts while just sitting in your gut that's probably a red flag that something about your digestive system is off.

2 days ago

t-3

Billions of people eat spicy foods on a daily basis without any issues. As long as he doesn't rub peppers into his eyes or bathe in hot sauce he'll be fine.

2 days ago

sosborn

How many billions of people start their day by getting one Scotch Bonnet (or two smaller ones), two oranges, lime and a piece of ginger into a cold press and then drinking it in one go on an empty stomach?

2 days ago

t-3

No idea, but I often eat hot peppers in every meal of the day. I'd expect any possible issues to arise from chugging it one go and not priming the digestive system through mastication, but I can't imagine any real problems - after all, there are many types of drinks containing peppers.

2 days ago

tombert

I don't generally love super spicy food (the most I do like 95% of the time is the Taco Bell Fire Sauce), but every now and than I want something really spicy.

I'm not sure why this is the case, but I'll go to a place with some Habanero sauce and get that on a meal. It will hurt (and my time in the bathroom the next day might be a little unpleasant), but it satisfies the urge.

2 days ago

MyHonestOpinon

I know if my Mexican wife is angry depending on how hot is the food and the sauces that she makes. I have also learned that very hot sauces can damage your nails as you scratch the walls the next day.

2 days ago

tombert

Funnily enough, my wife is Mexican and I think I have a higher tolerance for spicy food than she does. She won't even do the Taco Bell Fire Sauce.

2 days ago

MyHonestOpinon

That is a bit suspicious. How accurate is she with the chancla at long range?

2 days ago

tombert

Impressively accurate, as I have discovered.

2 days ago

halapro

The last time I bit into a nice juicy spicy pepper in the morning, I had to crouch in pain for 5 minutes as I felt stabbed right in the heart. The pepper wasn't even spicy like a bonnet, but I had an empty stomach.

So yeah no more peppers without rice for me.

2 days ago

stickfigure

"If you eat a live frog in the morning, nothing worse will happen to either you or the frog for the rest of the day."

2 days ago

butlike

Here's me hoping this is a hint that hot peppers kill a lot of things: resistant bacteria, cancers, inflamed cells, etc. since I love them so.

2 days ago

RataNova

Nature is probably still one of the best drug discovery libraries we have

2 days ago

riffraff

"keep in mind, so does a handgun"[0]

[0] https://xkcd.com/1217/

3 days ago

flobosg

My favorite antibiotic is fire.

2 days ago

jjk166

I'm partial to concentrated ethanol.

2 days ago

alkyon

"The team was able to isolate two colorless molecules called benzoquinones—heterocyclic compounds that do not contain amino acids"

Hats off, not only were they able to isolate just two molecules, but also established that they were colorless.

I don't think this is a usual definition for benzoquinones:

"heterocyclic compounds that do not contain amino acids".

I can smell Sam Altman's socks reading this article.

2 days ago

kees99

"colorless molecules called benzoquinones"

...and then dozen of words further on:

"blue benzoquinone has the capacity to act against the bacteria that cause tuberculosis, while the red one is effective against Staphylococcus aureus."

How quaint! Blue colorless molecule is different from the red colorless molecule!

2 days ago

aposm

Maybe you should not omit those "dozens of words" that clearly explain what you're trying to portray as a contradiction.

> These molecules have a particular property: When they come into contact with air, they oxidize and change color. One becomes blue and the other red.

2 days ago

kees99

You are absolutely right.

Maybe I shouldn't. But then I have to deep-dive into yet another flagrant cheap hallucination. You see, when a molecule oxidize, it becomes a different molecule.

It is impossible for a benzoquinone to oxidize, yet remain a benzoquinone. There are just two of them [1], and the two are isomers [2]. Transforming one into another would be isomerisation, not oxidation.

Not to mention — "oxidize on contact with air" is such a pile of nonsense. Just look at those things: benzene ring with a couple of oxygens sticking from it. [1] That stuff is pretty darn stable in presence of atmospheric oxygen.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzoquinone

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer

2 days ago

[deleted]
2 days ago

wolvoleo

The red hot chilli peppers are also good against depression so I'm not surprised

3 days ago

throwa356262

And here I was believing that psychic spices from China steal your mind's elation

2 days ago

obsidian_spider

[dead]

2 days ago

aliljet

[dead]

3 days ago