Giving a domain a hill to climb: benchmarking as data activation

12 points
1/21/1970
5 days ago
by galsapir

Comments


Terretta

I wanted to like this and appreciated the genAI tokens were teased into a less AI-ish vernacular, but surfaces and honest caveats drifted back too far to overcome the "I'm human" signaling attempted through lowercase sentences and em dashes replaced with colons.

I agree with the problem described within, and in the dead comment here.

2 days ago

galsapir

thanks for reading it properly and engaging with the argument!

writing is hard, expressing ideas cleanly is harder! working on it.

a day ago

kjeiwoo

The flaw becomes an incentive...Goood point

a day ago

zarzavat

What's with the lack of capitalization?

a day ago

nnevatie

It is a new brand of a “cool” FAD.

a day ago

[deleted]
a day ago

2key

interesting take not sure I 100% agree

and yet, Interesting take

5 days ago

galsapir

curious where the disagreement lands: the claim i'm least sure of myself is that measurement alone already counts as activation (nothing in the weights changes, so it's a looser sense of the word than usual) the part i'd defend harder is the eval -> reward one: once a benchmark becomes the thing you train against, its flaws stop being measurement error and start being incentives. if you're pushing back somewhere in there, i'd genuinely like to hear it

5 days ago