Buried in Meta's $18B settlement is a legal pass on kids' data
39 points
1/21/1970
a day ago
by sbulaev
Comments
monneyboi
a day ago
smuhakg
Read it closer. It applies for the limited purpose of letting Meta train an AI model that detects children so they can be banned from the platform.
> That permission is being granted for the limited purpose of training and testing Meta’s age-assurance model and includes guardrails, but it’s a curious policy decision to make in a case centered on child safety, and one that could be difficult to properly enforce.
a day ago
GenericDev
[dead]
17 hours ago
pixelatedindex
Why would state AGs even agree to such a thing? It is absurd
a day ago
ChrisArchitect
Related:
Did Meta's Big Settlement Actually Help It?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49464678
Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children
21 hours ago
'the agreement also says that the state AGs have agreed “fully, finally, and forever” not to bring any past, present, or future COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act) claims — or claims under similar state laws — related to Meta’s use of children’s data.'
Wow... That's some wild language.
'The agreement makes clear that Meta can’t use data from users under age 13 for ad targeting, marketing, or algorithmic optimization.'
Right, so once you're 13, you're fair game. Do I read that correctly?