Twitterwebviewer.com Service Discontinued

31 points
1/21/1970
7 hours ago
by nothrowaways

Comments


chii

completely expected, but still quite sad.

But like hydra, cut off one head, and two shall spawn. It should never be illegal to proxy another site, if the information content from that site was originally user generated. Using copyright as a shield is just a legal mechanism, and i don't believe it is just.

Therefore, it is civic duty for all to commit civil disobedience on this.

6 hours ago

nielsbot

It would be nice if every logged in twitter user's viewed tweets were transmitted to a decentralized aggregation service for all to view freely.

6 hours ago

WithinReason

Same with YouTube -> bittorrent, in my opinion

5 hours ago

techteach00

Why? Let the world yell into the void. Nobody is listening anymore.

5 hours ago

georgemcbay

> it is civic duty for all to commit civil disobedience on this.

While I support civil disobedience, it would be more impactful if people just stopped using twitter.

I suspect this may be an unpopular take, but this late in the game I simply think less of people who continue to use twitter while complaining about how bad it has gotten.

Of course it got bad. And it is continually going to get worse. It is never again going to be that place that only lives on in people's rose-colored nostalgia.

But... they can leave it. The world will keep turning, and in fact will improve.

6 hours ago

bambax

Don't know why this is downvoted. Users need to quit Twitter en masse, and others should not try to read whatever's on it. I quit Twitter two years ago and didn't miss it one bit.

9 minutes ago

ButlerianJihad

> if people just stopped using [X]

That’s not how it works, and you don’t understand the Network Effects at work here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49450055

5 hours ago

georgemcbay

My point is that people can choose not to use twitter despite the network effects.

I don't not use twitter because I think it hurts twitter. I don't use twitter because I know using it will hurt me.

Any politician/business/service/whatever that only makes announcements exclusively on twitter simply won't reach me, and I'm fine with that. I can't think of a single instance where missing such an announcement directly on the twitter timeline would have changed my life in a significant way.

5 hours ago

ChrisArchitect

an hour ago

[deleted]
6 hours ago

rf15

Won't this lead to even less people looking at the platform? Are they trying to cut off the cultists inside from any outside observability? Doesn't that directly result in less power/influence for Musk?

5 hours ago

conartist6

Yes. Since they've made clear that I'm unwelcome, I'll also simply skip over reading their content wherever it is embedded on the internet now.

5 hours ago

techteach00

it's funny. Twitter lost so much of it's power and reach when it went behind a login type paywall. if people can't see what's posted, why post it lol? The super majority of people see tweets logged out. Dead platform.

5 hours ago

Markoff

well, since Nitter stopped working I've stopped reading Twitter posts, it doesn't seem like much information value for me was lost, though especially now during Nepal floods it would be probably good source of videos, more difficult to skim through them on Reddit/4chan, if one is interested in videos of disasters

5 hours ago

Leonard_of_Q

Self-hosted Nitter still works for now, it is what I use to read X posts. You do need an (or, better still, some) account(s) but those are easy to create for now. The account(s) don't need any history, freshly-minted free accounts do just fine.

3 hours ago