Proton Flock Camera Map

122 points
1/21/1970
2 days ago
by cdrnsf

Comments


illithid0

I'm a big fan of Proton, and I couldn't imagine using anyone else's email services, but in the age of ID verification for porn and governments trying to ban VPNs, I just hope there aren't any bears that feel this poke is too hard.

2 days ago

ohihcocyc

Proton is in bed with the bears.

a day ago

illithid0

Care to elaborate?

a day ago

eiiot

This map is missing a number of locations near me that DeFlock (https://deflock.org/) has. For example, entrances to Stanford's campus.

2 days ago

LimeLimestone

> entrances to Stanford's campus

Wtf?

I'm not from the US, so please bear with me, but does this mean that, if I were to study there, I wouldn't be able to enter the campus without being tracked by a private company?

2 days ago

cowlevel

Yes. But Stanford is already a private company that tracks you.

2 days ago

etoxin

Protons map includes other countries.

2 days ago

b00ty4breakfast

It is very good that Flock is getting so much negative attention, but I fear that Flock may be a "trap crop" in this space, distracting the public taking all the heat while some other companies are doing the same thing without all the public awareness.

2 days ago

ssl-3

I'm not worried about it. It's just a word.

Regular folks often refer to any larger-than-phone, smaller-than-laptop device they see with a screen as an iPad, even if it's a hardwired Clover payment terminal running Android. The description is wrong, but it's easier to accept it than to correct it. I'm over it.

Regular folks can go ahead and call any nefariously-networked camera a Flock camera. This description is also wrong, but I'm over it as well.

2 days ago

b00ty4breakfast

I'm not worried about genericized trademarks. We may end up getting rid of Flock the company without getting rid of what Flock is doing.

2 days ago

mindslight

We need to turn town/city level "stop/cancel Flock contract" momentum into state-level privacy laws that prohibit the general behavior.

One of the things we need to develop is a rough shape these laws should take, as it's not immediately apparent [0]. For starters - prohibiting ALPR/face recognition/anything else that turns standing video surveillance into personally identifiable information. Prohibiting city/town/state governments from setting these up on public property. Prohibiting corporate owned/controlled/backhauled cameras recording at any area that hasn't been expressly authorized by its owner/occupant. Statutory limits of retention times, and a requirement that all corporate users of surveillance cameras publish their locations and retention policy.

That's what I can think of off the top of my head. It's a thorny problem because there are longstanding uses of video surveillance that are mostly okay, while only sometimes abusive. The real sea change with "Flock" is the scale and the automation.

[0] whereas the way to approach tackling online surveillance is apparent - ie privacy legislation akin to the GDPR

a day ago

carimura

The two in my California neighborhood actually got cut down about a month ago and one hasn't been replaced yet (still shows active on that map). My neighborhood board voted to tell the Sheriff's department NOT to replace it.

It's interesting how there's pretty strong voices on all sides of the political spectrum calling for the removal of them (for different reasons).

2 days ago

olegdotcom

Why are there so few cameras in Manhattan, but so many almost everywhere else? San Francisco has a ton of them for example.

2 days ago

plainenglish

The NYPD already have a far more invasive system, 'Domain Awareness'.

a day ago

FergusArgyll

Wow, they're everywhere. I did not realize the extent of it

2 days ago

etoxin

There's one in Cuba and others scattered around Mexico. Also Hawaii and South Africa.

2 days ago

BatchJob

This is really great, amazing. Thanks Proton for rolling this out.

2 days ago

xqcgrek2

That must be a treasure trove of camera data.

2 days ago

[deleted]
2 days ago

joering2

Beautifully put together. I was disgusted to know Home Depot allowed for cameras facing each exit, meanwhile others like Lowe's pushed back. I will never go to Home Depo again, and find most product same pricing or few cents more expensive at Lowe's. Who cares? These people been #1 customers for HD and this is how you pay back...

I wish some rich Law Firm would file a class action lawsuit against Home Depo for violation of basic privacy. All you need is a receipt of purchased product, as there is no other way to enter their premises than to park upfront and get your license read and stored indefinitely.

2 days ago

pkthunder

I can only speak to my own experiences but plenty of Lowes have cameras pointing at or away from their parking lots around my area. Same with HD.

a day ago

MalbertKerman

At my local pair of stores (Home Depot and Lowe's across the street), it's the Lowe's lot that has a Flock camera on every entrance.

a day ago

onebeartwobears

[dead]

2 days ago